Kishan Kumar Soni @ Babli v. Mahant Avinash Kumar Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RC.REV. 49/2020
- KISHAN KUMAR SONI @ BABLI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Preeti Thalan and Mr. Chandra Bhanu Pratap, Advs.
versus
MAHANT AVINASH KUMAR SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Saxena, Mr. Vaibhav Saxena & Ms. Rachna Gautam, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
- The Affidavit filed by the Petitioner, in compliance of order dated 20.11.2024, is not on record.
- 1.1 On steps being taken, let the same be brought on record.
- Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that the said Affidavit is not in terms of the order dated 20.11.2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kishan Kumar Soni @ Babli
- respondent
Mahant Avinash Kumar Sharma
Coram
Tara Vitasta Ganju
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court