The High Court disposed of rent-related petitions as infructuous after the respondent had already taken possession of the premises through execution proceedings, noting that the petitioners' rights were protected under Section 19(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61 & 62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 249/2023 & CM Appl.47483/2023 ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner
MANJEET KAUR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Wadhwa, Mr. Sahil Sharma, Advs. with Respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2024 at 12:26:12
possession of the subject premises has been restored, nothing further survives in the present Petitions and the Petitions have become infructuous.
4.1 In this regard, reliance is placed upon the judgment passed by this Court in Ashok Gupta v. Deepak Rao1 , which has relied upon the Judgments of the Supreme Court in NC Daga v. Inder Mohan Singh Rana2 and Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan Verma3 . This Court is supported in its view by judgments passed by Coordinate Benches of this Court including Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & Sons v. Ajay Khurana4 , Neelam Sharma v. Ekant Rekhan5 , and Bhawani Shankar v Nand Lal and Ors.6
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
NOVEMBER 19, 2024/r
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
1 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7148
2 (2003) 1 SCC 453
3 Civil Appeal Nos. 5220-5221 of 2008 dated 19.08.2008
4 2024 SCC OnLine Del 5228
5 2019 SCC Online Del 6487
6 2021 SCC OnLine Del 4284
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2024 at 12:26:12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions survive after the respondent has taken physical possession of the premises through execution proceedings?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashok Gupta v. Deepak RaoReferred¶19
Ashok Gupta v. Deepak Rao 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7148 · Who else cites this
NC Daga v. Inder Mohan Singh RanaReferred¶19
NC Daga v. Inder Mohan Singh Rana (2003) 1 SCC 453 · Who else cites this
Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan VermaReferred¶19
Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan Verma Civil Appeal Nos. 5220-5221 of 2008 dated 19.08.2008
Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & Sons v. Ajay KhuranaReferred¶19
Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & Sons v. Ajay Khurana 2024 SCC OnLine Del 5228 · Who else cites this
Neelam Sharma v. Ekant RekhanReferred¶19
Neelam Sharma v. Ekant Rekhan 2019 SCC Online Del 6487 · Who else cites this
Bhawani Shankar v Nand Lal and Ors.Referred¶19
Bhawani Shankar v Nand Lal and Ors. 2021 SCC OnLine Del 4284 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Kumar
Asha Rani
Manjeet Kaur
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
