Disposed

Mohd Aslam v. Salma Yusuf & Ors.

Delhi HC7 Aug 2024RC.REV./444/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a revision petition challenging the dismissal of a leave to defend application in an eviction suit based on bona fide need, the Delhi High Court disposed of the matter by granting the petitioner time to vacate the premises on or before 15.08.2024 upon settlement of the dispute between parties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner given time to vacate premises on or before 15.08.2024; revision petition and pending applications disposed of.

Mohd Aslam Vs Salma Yusuf & Ors. — Landlord and Tenant | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~62

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RC.REV. 444/2019

¶4

MOHD ASLAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate with Petitioner in person

¶5

versus

¶6

SALMA YUSUF & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Absar Ahmad, Adv. with R-2 & 3 in person

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 07.08.2024

¶9

The present revision petition is filed under section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 to impugn the order dated 20.02.2019 passed by the court of Sh. Shirish Aggarwal, ARC-1, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “ the trial court ”) in E-12/2015 (New no. 79154/16) whereby the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioner/tenant was dismissed.

¶10

The respondent/landlord filed an eviction petition under section 14(1)(e) read with section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in respect of shop measuring about 16ft x10 ft, with two shutters on the ground floor bearing no. 2362-63, Ward no. VII, Rodgran, Farash Khana, Delhi - 110006 against the petitioner/tenant on the ground of bona fide need. The petitioner/tenant, after service of summons as per the Third Schedule, filed

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:36:14

¶13

an application for leave to defend which was dismissed by the trial court vide the impugned order dated 20.02.2019, as a consequence of which, an eviction order was passed in favour of the respondent/landlord.

¶14

The petitioner being aggrieved filed the present petition

¶15

The counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the respondent stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The petitioner who is present in person in the court stated that he will vacate the tenanted premises on or before 15.08.2024. The statement made by the petitioner who is present in person is taken on record.

¶16

In view of the submissions made by petitioner and the respective counsel for the parties, the petitioner is given time to vacate the tenanted premises on or before 15.08.2024. Accordingly, the present petition along with pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

¶17

DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J

¶18

AUGUST 7, 2024 AKC/ABK

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:36:14

Mohd Aslam v. Salma Yusuf & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Aslam v. Salma Yusuf & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anjali Sethi Vs Joginder Pal Vij & Ors.

Joginder Singh Vs Yogesh Narain Gupta & Ors.

Kishan Lal Vs Ainuddin

Shri Bharat Lal Vs Smt Poonam Talwr

Raj Rani & Anr. Vs M/S Kochar Exports

Abodh Kumar Mandal Vs the Govt. of NCT of Delhi through Its Chief Secretary & Ors.