Dismissed
Kishan Lal v. Ainuddin
Delhi HCRC.REV./191/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw petitions as possession of tenanted premises had been restored to respondent/landlord. Court dismissed petitions as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the present petitions granted; petitions and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~13 & 14
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 191/2019 & CM APPL. 14360/2019 KISHAN LAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Khanna, Advocate with the petitioner in person
¶4
- versus
¶5
- AINUDDIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aiful Islam and Mohd Elahi, Advocates
¶6
- RC.REV. 194/2019 & CM APPL. 14424/2019 KISHAN LAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Khanna, Advocate with the petitioner in person
¶7
- versus
¶8
- AINUDDIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aiful Islam and Mohd Elahi, Advocates
¶9
- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R
¶10
- % 06.08.2024
¶11
- Mr. Sunil Khanna, Advocate for the petitioner accompanied by the petitioner in person stated that the possession of the tenanted premises has already been restored to the repondent/landlord and due to this reason, he seeks permission to withdraw the present petitions.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
KISHAN LAL
- respondent
AINUDDIN
Coram
AI extract
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court