The petitioner sought withdrawal after tenants handed over possession. Respondents confirmed restoration. The court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition with such prayer.
Petition allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
M/S MILLIONAIRE ESTATE PVT LTD .....Petitioner
versus
M/S PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE & INVESTMENT CO LTD & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. D.D. Dayani, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 12.08.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
AUGUST 12, 2024 sk/am
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/08/2024 at 11:48:35
M/S MILLIONAIRE ESTATE PVT LTD
M/S PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE & INVESTMENT CO LTD
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
