Disposed

Lalit Choudhary & Anr. v. Pratap Singh & Anr.

Delhi HC9 Aug 2024RC.REV./227/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition and application filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The court directed the trial court to pronounce judgment within three months concluding arguments, without any objection from the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of the petition and application; directed the trial court to pronounce judgment within three months after conclusion of arguments.

Lalit Choudhary & Anr. Vs Pratap Singh & Anr. — Landlord and Tenant | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~61

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RC.REV. 227/2020 & CM APPL. 27849/2020

¶4

LALIT CHOUDHARY & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Amarjot Kaur, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

PRATAP SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.L. Sharma, Advocate for R-2

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN

¶9

O R D E R % 09.08.2024

¶10

The present petition is filed under section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 to impugn the order dated 27.01.2020 passed by the court of Ms. Aditi Garg, CCJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “trial court” ) in eviction petition bearing no. E-770/2018 titled as Lalit Choudhary and Anr. V Pratap Singh and Anr. filed by the petitioners under section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 whereby the trial court has allowed the application for grant of leave to defend the eviction petition filed by the respondent no. 2/tenant.

¶11

The respective counsel for the petitioners and the respondent no.2 stated that after the conclusion of the trial, the case is listed for final arguments on 18.09.2024.

¶12

Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate for the petitioners stated that the present

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/08/2024 at 11:48:40

¶15

petition be disposed of with the direction to the trial court to decide the eviction petition within a period of three months. The counsel for the respondent no. 2 does not have any objection to this proposal.

¶16

Accordingly, the present petition, along with pending application, is disposed of with the direction to the trial court to pronounce the judgment after conclusion of the arguments preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order.

¶17

The counsel for the petitioners and the respondent no. 2 assured the Court that they shall not be seeking any adjournment without any justified reason and shall conclude the arguments as early as possible.

¶18

A copy of this order be sent to the trial court for information and compliance.

¶19

DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J

¶20

AUGUST 9, 2024 AKC/AM

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/08/2024 at 11:48:40

Lalit Choudhary & Anr. v. Pratap Singh & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalit Choudhary & Anr. v. Pratap Singh & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abodh Kumar Mandal Vs the Govt. of NCT of Delhi through Its Chief Secretary & Ors.

Pawan Kumar ( Halwai ) Vs Krishan Singla ( Since Deceased) Thr His Lrs

Neeraj Ahuja Vs Neeraj Chhabra

Naveen Mehta & Anr. Vs Pankaj Sharma

Captain Amit Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Om Prakash Vs Smt. Meenu Gupta & Ors.