The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition regarding the vacating of tenanted premises. The court held that since possession had been handed over based on the petitioner's counsel's statement, no further legal consideration of the petition was required.
The present petition is disposed of along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
BABLI SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ashish Kapur and Mr. Anmol Kapur, Advocates
versus
NANAK CHAND BANSAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:45:17
of the counsel for the petitioners on instructions that the possession of the tenanted premises shall be handed over to the respondents on or before 13.05.2024, no further consideration is required in this petition.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
JULY 10, 2024 Sk/am
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:45:17
Babli Sharma & Ors.
Nanak Chand Bansal & Ors.
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
