The petitioner sought to set aside an expired dis-empanelment order. The court held the petition infructuous as the empanelment period had lapsed, but granted liberty to remove prejudice and allowed the petition to be dismissed on withdrawal.
Liberty granted to remove prejudice; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
versus
Through: Mr. Arnav Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Chetanya Kapoor, Advocate for R-1/UOI Ms. Punam Singh, Advocate for R-2
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 18:32:18
apprehension that dis-empanelment vide the impugned order dated 12.10.2020 may act prejudice to the interest of the petitioner. However, he seeks permission to withdraw the present petition but, with the liberty to initiate appropriate legal proceedings in case of altered circumstances.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
JULY 10, 2024 Sk/hvk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 18:32:18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking to set aside an expired dis-empanelment order can be allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.
Raj Kumar Security Agency
Union of India
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
