Petitioner, who held six months to vacate property under previous court order, filed a parliamentary petition to withdraw the challenge to the impugned order, submitting the period would expire before vacatur. The challenged order is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~69
Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar Verma, Adv. with Petitioner in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
OCTOBER 8, 2024/r Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2024 at 11:52:28
PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA
VIJAY KUMAR & ANR
TARA VITASTA GANJU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
