The petitioner tenant applied for adjournment. The respondent landlord submitted that possession had already been recovered and she would not pursue arrears of rent. The court accepted this, granted liberty to withdraw, and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
Through: Mr. Jai Shankar, Adv .with Ms. Nandita Rao, Mr. Amit Kumar Debey, Mr. Mayank Beroya, Mr. Manoj Kumar Makhija, Mr. Ashish Kumar and MR. Dev Anand, Advs. alongwith Petitioner in person.
SMT. RAJKUMARI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sonia A. Menon, Adv. CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:53:18
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
OCTOBER 8, 2024/SA
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:53:18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be allowed to be withdrawn given that possession has been taken and the respondent has waived further claims?
SHRI DEV ANAND
SMT. RAJKUMARI
TARA VITASTA GANJU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
