Dismissed
Aftabuddin Malik v. Salamuddin
Delhi HCRC.REV./106/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court dismissed a revision petition and a connected application in default for want of prosecution, as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~28
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 106/2020 & CM APPL. 6689/2020 AFTABUDDIN MALIK .....Petitioner
¶4
- Through: None
¶5
versus SALAMUDDIN .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
¶6
- O R D E R
¶7
- % 05.08.2024
¶8
- Present none on behalf of the parties when the case is called out at 02:45 PM.
¶9
- None is appearing on behalf of the petitioner since long.
¶10
- It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecution of the
¶11
- case.
¶12
- Accordingly, the present petition along with pending application stands dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Aftabbuddin Malik
- respondent
Salamuddin
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Kumar Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court