Petitioner sought to withdraw the revision petition and pending applications after expressing intent to initiate separate proceedings for recovery of belongings. The Court disposed of the matter by dismissing the petition and applications as withdrawn.
Petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
AVTAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Pushkar Sood, Adv. versus RAJ RANI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Mukesh Kumar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 07.05.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM APPL. 53913/2023 (directions) & CM APPL. 21214/2023 (stay) and RC.REV. 113/2023
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
MAY 7, 2024/ ry
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2024 at 12:43:04
Avtar Singh
Raj Rani
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
