HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
Mandate of the arbitrator extended for one year from 19.11.2024 till 18.11.2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
NAV SHAKTI TRADERS .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Umesh Mishra, Advocate
versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED.....Respondent Through: Mr. Subhash Chandran K.R., Ms. Krishna L.R., Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
I.A. 47200/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 947/2024, I.A. 47201/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:45:06
mandate of the Arbitrator.
any.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
DECEMBER 05, 2024 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:45:06
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the sole arbitrator could be extended after its expiry under Sections 29A(4) and (5).
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India LimitedRelied on
2024 SCC OnLine SC 2494 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nav Shakti Traders
Kerala State Electricity Board Limited
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
