This order allows an interim application under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, granting the petitioner one year extension for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce an award pending cross-examination.
Extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a further period of one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
Through: Mr. Dhruv Dewan, Mr. Rohan Batra, Mr. Rishabh Bhargava, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Arora, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chiranjeev Kumar, Mr. Sumit Agarwal and Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
I.A. 45719/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 909/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/11/2024 at 12:01:44
Tribunal for making the Arbitral Award.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
NOVEMBER 22, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/11/2024 at 12:01:44
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended to allow time for making the arbitral award.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jupiter Wagons Ltd
Union of India, Ministry of Defence
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
