Delhi High Court extended the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal for six months under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act, 1996 to allow the tribunal to pronounce an award after final arguments concluded.
Extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a further period of six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
BITCHEM ASPHALT TECHNOLOGIES LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Uttam Datt, Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Mr. Kumar Bhaskar, Advs.
versus
CSIR-CENTRAL ROAD RESEARCH INSTITUTE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bhuvanesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma, Mr. Aniket Khanduri, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 12.11.2024
I.A. 44737/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 879/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:22:10
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:22:10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended for six months to render the arbitral award.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India LimitedRelied on¶17
Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India Limited, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2494 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BITCHEM ASPHALT TECHNOLOGIES LTD
CSIR-CENTRAL ROAD RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
