Allowed

Reliance Infrastrcuture Limited v. Aravali Power Company Private Limited

Delhi HC18 Oct 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/828/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner an extension of time for completing arbitral proceedings and making an award, extending the deadline to May 31, 2025, as the respondent did not oppose the request.

What did the court decide?

The time period for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of the arbitral award is extended till 31.05.2025.

Reliance Infrastrcuture Limited Vs Aravali Power Company Private… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~50

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 828/2024

¶4

RELIANCE INFRASTRCUTURE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Mr. Aditya Panda, Mr. Aman Bajaj and Mr. Akshay S., Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

ARAVALI POWER COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED

¶7

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Adarsh Tripathi, Mr. Vikram Singh Baid and Mr. Ajitesh Garg, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R

¶10

% 18.10.2024

¶11

The present petition under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘the A&C Act’ ) has been filed by the petitioner seeking extension of time for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of arbitral award.

¶12

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the arbitral proceedings are at the stage of final arguments. It is pointed out that on the previous occasions, appropriate extensions have been granted by this Court upon a petition under Section 29A(4) of the A&C Act being filed by the petitioner.

¶13

It is submitted that the arbitration proceedings have been protracted in view of the nature of the matter and the time consumed by the parties in adducing their respective evidence, and completing their arguments.

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the present petition

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:22:34

¶16

seeking requisite extension of time for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of arbitral award. He further submits that learned Sole Arbitrator be also directed to grant some additional time to the respondent to complete its arguments. Needless to say, the respondent shall be at liberty to make a request in this regard to the learned Sole Arbitrator, who shall consider any such request on its own merit. However, taking note of the joint request for requisite extension of time, the time period of completion of arbitral proceedings and making of the arbitral award is extended till 31.05.2025. 5. The present petition stands disposed of.

¶17

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶18

OCTOBER 18, 2024/ at

¶19

Reliance Infrastrcuture Limited v. Aravali Power Company Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reliance Infrastrcuture Limited v. Aravali Power Company Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Nipun Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Narayan Buildtech

Ae Tollway Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Irb Tumkur Chitradurga Tollway Ltd. Earlier Known as Irb Tumkur Chitradurga Tollway Private Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Alstom Transport India Ltd. Erstwhile Alstom Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd.

M/S. Hsk Infra Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

M/S Richa Constructions Co. Vs M/S Nbcc India Ltd.

Overnite Express Limited Vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

Overnite Express Limited Vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

Leisure Builder Pvt. Ltd. Vs Shanti Swarup Bhadana

Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited Vs Nikhil Jain

Ms Inam and Co. Vs Airport Authority of India & Ors.

Extramarks Education India Pvt. Ltd. Vs G D Goenka Public School & Anr.

Mukesh Kumar Srivastav Vs Spire Techpark Private Limited

Manu Raj Bhalla Vs Spire Techpark Private Ltd.