Petitioner sought extension of Arbitral Tribunal mandate under Section 29A of the 1996 Act due to voluminous record and amendments. Court held sufficient cause existed and extended mandate.
Mandate of Arbitral Tribunal extended upto 31.01.2025; period regularized.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
LAXMAN SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Abhishek Kumar Singh, Mr Abhinav Jaganathan and Ms Anahika Yadav, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms Iram Majid, CGSC with Mr Mohd. Suboor, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R % 05.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2024 at 12:14:46
Arbitral Tribunal is extended upto 31.01.2025 for concluding the arbitral proceedings and passing the final award.
JASMEET SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 sr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2024 at 12:14:46
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause was explained for the delay in concluding arbitral proceedings.
Whether the extension of the tribunal's mandate should be granted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Laxman Sharma
Union of India
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
