Allowed a petition to extend the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal by six months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding sufficient cause for delay.
Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by a period of 6 months; period of delay regularized.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
SAMIR CHOPRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms Bhargavi Kanna, Adv.
versus
YOGESH MALIK AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr Abhimanyu Walia and Ms Ishani Pillai, Advs. for R-1 and R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2024 at 12:14:46
Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of 6 months from today.
JASMEET SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 sr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2024 at 12:14:46
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause has been explained for the delay in passing the final award warranting extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Samir Chopra
Yogesh Malik and Ors
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
