Petition seeking extension of the Sole Arbitrator's mandate to conclude arbitration proceedings. Respondent raised no objection; the court found sufficient cause for delay and granted a further six months from 16.05.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
VIR BHAN MITTAL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vikas Aggarwal and Mr. Anshu Mahajan, Advs.
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Tiwari, SC, Mr. Anurag Tiwari and Mr. Sahib Patel, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R
% 15.05.2024
I.A. 11093/2024-EX.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 390/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:40:27
JASMEET SINGH, J
MAY 15, 2024/NG
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:40:27
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause had been shown for delay in arbitration proceedings to justify extension of the arbitrator's mandate.
Vir Bhan Mittal
New Delhi Municipal Council
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
