Allowed

Max Royal Apartment Owners Association v. Konark Engineering

Delhi HC14 May 2024ARB.P./229/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allowed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. In the absence of the respondent's appearance, the court permitted the Delhi International Arbitration Centre to appoint a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate contractual disputes between the parties.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of a Sole Arbitrator through the Delhi International Arbitration Centre.

Max Royal Apartment Owners Association Vs Konark Engineering — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 229/2024

¶4

MAX ROYAL APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION

¶5

..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Umang Gangwar, Adv.

versus

KONARK ENGINEERING

..... Respondent

Through:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R

¶11

% 14.05.2024

¶12

This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶13

The arbitration clause is contained as Clause 16 in the Work Order dated 22.09.2022 and reads as under:-

¶14

“16. In case of any dispute/ disputes arises out of the contract then the parties will try and resolve the matter mutually and if all efforts fail, an Independent Arbitrator will be .appointed with the consent of both the parties under the arbitration and conciliation act 1996. The place or arbitration will be Noida/Delhi.”

¶15

Since there were disputes between the parties, the petitioner invoked arbitration vide Legal Notice dated 22.12.2023.

¶16

The petitioner filed the present petition and on 21.02.2024, this Court was pleased to issue notice to the respondent.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:24:58

¶19

As per the service report, the respondent has been served. Despite service, there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent.

¶20

For the said reasons, the petition is allowed. The Delhi International Arbitration Centre is requested to appoint a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of adjudication of disputes between the parties.

¶21

The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’).

¶22

The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶23

The petition is allowed and disposed of.

¶24

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶25

MAY 14, 2024/NG

¶26

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶27

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:24:58

Max Royal Apartment Owners Association v. Konark Engineering

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Max Royal Apartment Owners Association v. Konark Engineering

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs NTPC Limited

Tommorrowland Limited Vs Sanchay Finvest Limited

Nhpc Ltd. Vs Apaar Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

Tata Capital Limited Vs Prime Interglobe Private Limited & Ors.

Aditya Birla Finance Limited Vs M/S Anoop Oswal Hosiery and Ors.

Sumit Bansal Vs Mgi Developers and Promotors through Its Proprietor Sh Manoj Kumar Goyal & Ors.