Petition under Section 29A seeking extension of the arbitrator's mandate in disputes under a value added services agreement. Respondent raised no objection to extension but reserved objections on arbitrator fee and a pending application. Mandate extended by six months; petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
M/S HANDYGO TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, Mr. Siddharth Anil Khanna and Mr. Ritik Arora, Advs. (M: 7011197579).
versus
M/S BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja Adv. alongwith Ms. Ishita Kadyan and Ms. Ishita Prakash Advs. (M: 9999505508).
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R
% 06.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/05/2024 at 11:50:38
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
MAY 6, 2024 mr/bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/05/2024 at 11:50:38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the arbitrator should be extended under Section 29A beyond its expiry on 17th April, 2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Handygo Technologies Pvt Ltd
M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
