Disposed

M/S S. C Agarwal v. Union of India

Delhi HC6 May 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/365/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 29A seeking extension of the arbitrator's mandate, which had expired with arbitration at final-arguments stage. With no objection from the respondent, the court extended the mandate till 31st December 2024 and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the Sole Arbitrator extended till 31st December 2024; exemption application allowed subject to just exceptions.

M/S S. C Agarwal Vs Union of India — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~26

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 365/2024 and I.A. 10045/2024

¶4

M/S S. C AGARWAL ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. S W Haider & Ms. Pooja Dua, Advs. (M: 9311307710)

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, SPC. (M: 9717736267)

¶8

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 06.05.2024

¶9

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶10

I.A.10045/2024 (for exemption)

¶11

This is an application filed by the Petitioner seeking exemption from filing originals/certified/cleared/typed or translated copies of documents, proper margins, electronic documents, etc. Original documents shall be produced/filed, if sought, in accordance with law.

¶12

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is disposed of.

¶13

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 365/2024

¶14

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner- M/s S.C. Agarwal under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petitioner seeks extension of the mandate of the ld. Sole Arbitrator by a period of 6 months.

¶15

It is stated that disputes between the parties herein arose, subsequent to which, the Petitioner invoked arbitration vide its letter dated 3rd February,

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/05/2024 at 11:50:40

¶17

2021 in terms of Clause 64 of the General Conditions of Contract of Indian Railways. Vide order dated 29th January, 2021 the Court was pleased to appoint an arbitrator for adjudication of disputes between the parties herein. It is further stated in the petition that the matter is now at the stage of final arguments and the last hearing in the case was on 27th March, 2024, which was also the date on which mandate of the ld. Arbitral Tribunal had expired. 6. Ld. counsel for the Respondent has no objection. Accordingly, the mandate is extended till 31st December, 2024.

¶18

Petition is disposed of.

¶19

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶20

MAY 6, 2024/ dk/rks

¶21

M/S S. C Agarwal v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S S. C Agarwal v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harcharan Dass Gupta Vs Hindustan Pre Fab Limited

Adavya Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Vishal Structurals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Karmyogi Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Dost Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

M/S Kbg Engineers Vs Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd.

Star Mobitel Limited Vs Micromax Informatics Limited

Index Hospitality LLP Vs Contitel Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd.

Ms G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ms Gdn Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Adavya Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Vishal Structurals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Cec-Cici Jv Vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporationltd

M/S Eminent Food Stores India Private Limited Vs M/S Tnsi Retail Private Ltd.

M/S Ocm Singapore Njord Holdings Hardrada Pte Ltd. & Anr. Vs Mr. Prerit Goel & Ors.

M/S Handygo Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

Anuj Bedi & Ors. Vs Ajay Verma