Petitioner sought extension of Arbitral Tribunal mandate under Section 29(4) and (5) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. Respondent had no objection. Court extended mandate from 27.04.2024 to 31.12.2024 and disposed of petition.
Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended up to 31.12.2024 from 27.04.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
EMAS EXPRESSWAY PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.K. Chandwani, Advocate. versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORTIY OF INDIA
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Gopal Singh and Ms. Divya Nair, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 23, 2024/va
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/05/2024 at 12:27:46
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended beyond its expiry date of 26.04.2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
EMAS EXPRESSWAY PRIVATE LIMITED
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
