Disposed

Mis. Tata Aldesa (Jv) v. Mis. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited (Dfccil)

Delhi HC9 Apr 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/291/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate. The court noted the parties' prior agreement and extended the mandate until September 30, 2024.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the arbitral tribunal extended till 30th September, 2024.

What the court decided

Mis. Tata Aldesa (Jv) Vs Mis. Dedicated Freight Corridor… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~44

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 291/2024

¶4

MIS. TATA ALDESA (JV) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay N. Das and Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advs. (M: 9818918655)

¶5

versus

¶6

MIS. DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED (DFCCIL) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ipshita, Adv.

¶7

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 09.04.2024

¶10

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶11

I.A.8049/2024 (for exemption)

¶12

This is an application seeking exemption from filing originals/certified/cleared/typed or translated copies of documents, left side margins, electronic documents, etc. Original documents shall be produced/filed at the time of Admission/Denial, if sought, strictly as per the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act and the DHC (Original Side) Rules, 2018.

¶13

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

Accordingly, the application is disposed of.

¶15

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 291/2024

¶16

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner/Claimant- M/s Tata Aldesa under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:56:59

¶19

Tribunal, which is a three member tribunal till 31st July, 2024.

¶20

It is the case of the Petitioner that disputes between the parties arose with respect to the Contract Package, LOT 103 (hereinafter, ‘Contract’). Further, on 31st August, 2020 the Petitioner invoked arbitration in terms of Clause 20.6 and 20.8 of the Contract. Subsequently, the ld. Arbitral Tribunal was formed. However, due to certain issues, the ld Tribunal was reconstituted on 14th November, 2022. On 2nd February, 2024 the ld. Arbitral Tribunal directed the Petitioner to seek extension of the mandate of the ld. Arbitral Tribunal. Hence, this petition.

¶21

A perusal of the procedural order dated 2nd February, 2024 shows that the parties have already agreed to extend the mandate of the ld. Arbitral Tribunal. Accordingly, mandate of the ld. Arbitral Tribunal is extended till 30th September, 2024.

¶22

Petition is disposed of.

¶23

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶24

APRIL 9, 2024/ dk/rks

¶25

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:56:59

Mis. Tata Aldesa (Jv) v. Mis. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited (Dfccil)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Mis. Tata Aldesa (Jv) v. Mis. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited (Dfccil)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sohan Lal Commodity Management Private Limited Vs R R Agrotech

Tata Projects Limited & Anr. Vs Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of Lndia Limited

Tata Projects Limited & Anr. Vs Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited

Tata Project Limited & Anr. Vs Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited

M/S Mahesh Chand Contractors Vs Container Corporation of India Ltd.

Kota Baran Tollway Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Highways Authority of India

M/S. Ivy Ecoenergy India Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. Inox Green Energy Services Ltd.

M/S. Vanilla Clean Power Private Limited Vs M/S. Inox Green Energy Services Ltd.

Akhil Gupta Vs Hindustan Unilever Ltd.

Tata Projects Limited & Anr. Vs Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of Lndia Limited

Tata Projects Limited & Anr. Vs Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited

Smt Priyanka Maheshwari Vs Smt Pooja Maheshwari

Shri Sunil Kumar Vs Padam Kumar and Ors.

Col Lalan Chaubey Vs M/S Club Resorto Hospitality Ltd.