Allowed

Ashok Kumar Dusad (Huf) v. M/S Kwatra Rent and Caterers Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC2 Sept 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/290/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants an extension of six months to the petitioner to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for making and publishing the award, regularizing the delay, and notes the respondent's counsel stated reply was ready.

What did the court decide?

The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for making and publishing the Arbitral Award is extended by 6 months.

Ashok Kumar Dusad (Huf) Vs M/S Kwatra Rent and… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~23

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 290/2024

¶4

ASHOK KUMAR DUSAD (HUF) .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms. Sonam Sharma, Ms. Riddhi Jain, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S KWATRA RENT AND CATERERS PVT LTD.....Respondent Through: Ms. Aarushi Aggarwal, Adv.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 02.09.2024

I.A. 7985/2024

Exemption is granted subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

The petitioner shall file legible and clearer copies of exempted

¶15

documents, compliant with practice rules before the next date of hearing.

¶16

The application is disposed of.

¶17

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 290/2024

¶18

This is a petition seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for making and publishing the Arbitral Award.

¶19

It is stated that the respondent had filed an SLP as a result of which the arbitration proceedings were stayed from 19.08.2021 till 06.02.2024.

¶20

When the petition came up on 09.04.2024, notice was issued and on

¶21

17.05.2024, 4 weeks were granted to the respondent to file a reply.

¶22

On 29.07.2024, it was recorded that the reply could not be filed on

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2024 at 14:31:26

¶24

account of personal difficulty of the counsel for the respondent.

¶25

Ms. Aggarwal, learned counsel for the respondent states that the reply is ready and can be filed in due course.

¶26

I am of the view that substantial time has been granted to the respondent and no reply has been filed.

¶27

Even otherwise, I am also of the view that the petitioner has shown sufficient cause of delay in making and publishing the award.

¶28

For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for making and publishing the Arbitral Award is extended by 6 months.

¶29

The period of delay till today, in view of the reasons noted above, stands regularized.

¶30

The petition is disposed of.

¶31

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶32

SEPTEMBER 2, 2024/DM

¶33

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶34

This is a digitally signed order.

¶35

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2024 at 14:31:26

Ashok Kumar Dusad (Huf) v. M/S Kwatra Rent and Caterers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar Dusad (Huf) v. M/S Kwatra Rent and Caterers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tcns Clothing Company Limited Vs a and a Enterprises & Ors.

M/S Hamdard Laboratories (India) Vs M/S. Sterling Electro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Mcm Worldwide Private Limited Vs M/S Construction Industry Development Council

Lohia Developers India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Ms. Simplex Infrastructures Limited Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Era Infra Engineering Ltd. Vs NTPC Ltd.

Dimeco Formerly Known as Dimeco Alipresse through Indian Agent Kriti Inter Trade Vs Central Organisation for Modernization of Workshops through Controller of Stores & Anr.

Jain Infraprojects Limited Vs Steel Authority of India Limited

Vandna Rani Vs Indiamart Intermesh Ltd.

M/S Hamdard Laboratories (India) Vs M/S. Sterling Electro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Mr. Braham Arenja Vs Mr. Samir Jasuja & Ors.

Startupwala Private Limited Vs Google India Private Limited

Garg Builders Vs Hindustan Prefab Limited & Anr.

Mrs. Kamlesh Gulati & Ors. Vs Mr. Deepak Gulati & Anr.