The parties sought extension of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court granted the application, extending the mandate until 31.01.2024.
Mandate of the Arbitrator extended until 31.01.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
SAKUMA EXPORTS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V. Anush Raajan, Ms. Riya Mittal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 11.01.2024
PRATEEK JALAN, J
JANUARY 11, 2024 “Bhupi”/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:59:12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitrator should be extended until 31.01.2024?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Indian Sugar Exim Coproration Limited
Sakuma Exports Limited
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
