Petition under Section 11(6) sought appointment of a sole arbitrator for disputes under a Booking Services Agreement containing an arbitration clause. The respondent did not dispute the clause but sought mediation first. The court referred the parties to Samadhan mediation, with DIAC arbitration as fallback.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BHARAT ELECTRONICS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Paliwal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R
% 10.01.2024
ARB.P. 860/2023
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:13:34
PRATEEK JALAN, J
JANUARY 10, 2024 “Bhupi”/
ARB.P. 860/2023
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:13:34
1 issue framed by the court
Should an arbitral tribunal be appointed under Section 11(6) for disputes under the Booking Services Agreement, or should parties first be referred to mediation?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
OYO Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd
Bharat Electronics Ltd
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
