In a thin order, the High Court closed contempt proceedings and dismissed the pending appeal against a maintenance judgment after the respondent paid outstanding alimony dues as per his undertaking to the Court.
Contempt proceedings closed; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38 & 49
SAJILI VASISHT .....Appellant Through: Ms. Jyoti Kataria, Advocate
versus
ADITYA AGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person
49 CONT.CAS(C) 1968/2024
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Jyoti Kataria, Advocate
versus
ADITYA AGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 12.12.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:34:45
regarding the breach of his undertaking to this Court.
REKHA PALLI, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
DECEMBER 12, 2024/vc
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:34:45
Sajili Vasisht
Court on its own motion
Aditya Agarwal
Rekha Palli
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
