Dismissed
Fateh Singh v. Sushila & Anr.
Delhi HCMAT.APP.(F.C.)/267/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Matrimonial appeal dismissed as abated after counsel reported the appellant's death; the impugned judgment remains in force.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~49
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- MAT.APP.(F.C.) 267/2023 FATEH SINGH .....Appellant Through:
¶4
versus
¶5
SUSHILA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Vaibhav Vats, Adv.
¶6
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 18.12.2024
¶7
- None appears on behalf of the appellant when the matter is called out.
¶8
- Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has instructions to state that the appellant has since passed away.
¶9
- In the light of the aforesaid, the appeal stands abated and is, accordingly, dismissed and consequently, the impugned judgement will continue to remain in force.
¶10
REKHA PALLI, J
¶11
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Fateh Singh
- respondent
Sushila
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court