Matrimonial appeal withdrawn by the appellant with liberty to raise all contentions before the Family Court; appeal dismissed as withdrawn and pending application closed.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise contentions before the Family Court as per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
KRITIKA KAUSHIK ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Sumit Bansal, Mr Ateev Mathur, Mr Amol Sharma, Mr Udaibir Singh Kochhar, Ms Jagriti Ahuja, Ms Tulna Rampal and Mr Anmol Mehta, Advs.
versus
SANKALP SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Ms Anupam Srivastava and Mr Vasuh Misra, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
FEBRUARY 8, 2024/ aj
AMIT BANSAL, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:47:31
Kritika Kaushik
Sankalp Sharma
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
