The appellant sought to withdraw a family court appeal. The respondent raised no objection. The court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal and disposed of the matter.
Appeal withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
SIMRAN PUNJ ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Mrinalini Sen, Advocate.
versus
BHUPINDER SETHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr Akash Tomar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 09.02.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM APPL. 5909/2024
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 199/2017
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 260/2019
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 15:13:15
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024/ sr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 260/2019
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 15:13:15
Simran Punj
Bhupinder Sethi
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
