Matrimonial appeal disposed of by consent in terms of a Memorandum of Settlement covering payment and de-freezing of three bank lockers, with the respondent to withdraw complaints before the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security upon final payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
% Decision delivered on: 09.04.2024
RAJ KUMAR HINGORANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr Harsh Ahuja, Mr Addtya Kapoor, Mr Kushal Kumar and Mr Suryansh Gaur, Advs. along with appellant.
versus
SHILPI SRIVASTAV ..... Respondent Through: Mr Vineet Jhanji and Mr Imran Moulaey, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:VIPIN KUMAR RAI Signing Date:16.04.2024 11:38:00
MAT.APP. (F.C.) 228/2023 Page 1 of 3
(i) NOC for de-freezing of the bank locker bearing Locker No.673 maintained by the appellant, i.e., Mr Raj Kumar Hingorani in Punjab National Bank, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi-110008.
(ii) NOC concerning de-freezing of the bank locker bearing Locker No.2979 maintained by Mr Sandeep Hingorani and Ms Aditi Hingorani in the Corporation Bank [now, Union Bank of India], Branch Gurugram, Haryana-122001.
(iii) NOC pertaining to de-freezing of the bank locker bearing Locker No.294 maintained by Ms Aditi Hingorani in the HDFC Bank Ltd., Old Rajendera Nagar Branch, New Delhi-110060. 4. All told, the MOS, along with Schedule ‘A’ and three NOCs, consists of 10 pages. 5. We have examined the terms of the MOS. According to us, the same are lawful. We may note that Clause 8 of the MOS, inter alia, states that upon final payment being made by the appellant via a demand draft, the respondent shall withdraw all the complaints lodged by her against the appellant before the Director General, Bureau of Civil Aviation Security, Delhi [hereafter referred to as “Director General”]. The said clause refers to the application as outlined in Schedule ‘A’, to which we have made a reference above.
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:VIPIN KUMAR RAI Signing Date:16.04.2024 11:38:00
MAT.APP. (F.C.) 228/2023 Page 2 of 3
Director General within three (3) days of receipt of the demand draft. 8. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the MOS. The parties will adhere to the terms of the MOS. Consequently, the pending application shall stand closed.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
APRIL 9, 2024 aj
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:VIPIN KUMAR RAI Signing Date:16.04.2024 11:38:00
MAT.APP. (F.C.) 228/2023 Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the matrimonial appeal could be disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 30.03.2024 between the parties.
Raj Kumar Hingorani
Shilpi Srivastav
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
