Allowed
Anuradha Kashyap v. Dr Sushil Kumar
Delhi HCMAT.APP.(F.C.)/109/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appeals court set aside an order closing cross-examination due to counsel shortages, granted one final opportunity, mandating the Family Court to proceed if counsel is absent, and imposed costs on the appellant for the delays.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order set aside; appellant granted one final opportunity to cross-examine; costs of Rs. 7,500 imposed on appellant; pending applications closed.