appellant, the respondent came back to her matrimonial home on 25.07.2012. But again, on 11.08.2012 she told the appellant that she wanted to go back to her parental home. When the appellant had told the respondent to adjust in the matrimonial home, the respondent had threatened to commit suicide. On the same day, the respondent called her father in the evening and left her matrimonial home. On 22.08.2012, the appellant, alongwith his brother, went to the parental home of the respondent to bring her back to the matrimonial home which she again refused. Similar efforts were made by the appellant on 05.09.2012. In yet another attempt on 19.09.2012, the respondent came back to her matrimonial home. 6. The appellant averred that the respondent had never adjusted in the matrimonial home and was very disrespectful towards the appellant and his family members. The respondent used to leave her matrimonial home and go to her parental home as and when she desired. The appellant also alleged that the respondent was of quarrelsome nature and a short tempered lady, who was non-cooperative and hostile towards the appellant and his family. The appellant also alleged that the respondent frequently visited her parents without his consent and stayed there for long time altogether and used to come back on her own. She picked-up quarrels on petty matters and openly declared that she will live according to her wishes. The appellant alleged that she used to get up late in the morning and never did any household work and if there were guests at home, she would attend them unwillingly. Not only this, the appellant has alleged that she avoided co-habitation with him and was reluctant to maintain physical relations and even on various occasions she warned him that if he tried to touch her, she would not
