The High Court observed that the appellant, who was an appellant in a maintenance enhancement matter, had passed away. Consequently, the Court held that no matter survives for adjudication and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Madhup Kumar Tiwari, Advs
versus
KAUSHLENDRA KUMAR .....Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
REKHA PALLI, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
DECEMBER 12, 2024/Ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:37:20
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nutan Yadav
Kaushlendra Kumar
Rekha Palli
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
