Disposed

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Yash Aggarwal & Ors. (United India Insurance Compnay Ltd.)

Delhi HC7 Nov 2024MAC.APP./51/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal by DTC, owner of an insured bus, against an award making it liable to pay compensation jointly with the insurer. The High Court clarified that since the vehicle was duly insured and no statutory defence existed, compensation was payable by DTC but indemnified by the Insurance Company. Appeal disposed of.

What the court decided

AI extract

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs Yash Aggarwal & Ors. (United India… — Insurance | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~19

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- MAC.APP. 51/2023

¶4

DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

YASH AGGARWAL & ORS. (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPNAY LTD.) .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mayank Khurana, Mr. Mahender Kumar & Mr. Akash Tomar, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for Insurance Company through VC. Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for R-2/Driver.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶9

¶10

O R D E R 07.11.2024

¶11

The present Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed on behalf of the Appellant, Delhi Transport Corporation i.e. the owner of the offending vehicle, against the Award dated 21.07.2022 and Order dated 06.08.2022, whereby the Review Application of the Appellant was dismissed by the learned Tribunal.

¶12

The short ground of challenge is that the vehicle i.e., the DTC Bus bearing No. DL-IPC-0406, was admittedly insured with the Insurance Company and there was no statutory defence available to the Insurance Company to seek the recovery from the owner. However, in Paragraph-51

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:06:38

¶14

of the impugned Award dated 21.07.2022, it has been observed that the driver, owner/DTC and the Insurance Company are liable to pay the entire award amount and consequently had been directed to deposit the compensation amount.

¶15

Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that once the vehicle was validly insured, the liability to indemnify the owner is on the Insurance Company and there could be no separate direction made against the appellant to deposit the compensation amount along with the Insurance Company.

¶16

Submissions heard.

¶17

It is not in dispute that the vehicle which is DTC Bus was duly insured with the Insurance Company and there is no statutory defence. Consequently, the Paragraph-51 of the Impugned Award is hereby clarified to say that the compensation was liable to be paid by the DTC being the owner. However, the same shall be indemnified by the Insurance Company with which the DTC Bus was duly insured.

¶18

In view of above, the present Appeal is disposed of.

¶19

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶20

NOVEMBER 7, 2024 S.Sharma

¶21

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Yash Aggarwal & Ors. (United India Insurance Compnay Ltd.)

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Yash Aggarwal & Ors. (United India Insurance Compnay Ltd.)

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh. Bharat Rajak Vs Mainuddin Ansari & Anr.

M/S. Shiv Probuild Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. Kundu Nirman

Suman Khadka Vs Sandeep and Orthers

Sita Devi (Deceased) Thr Lrs Vs Tan Singh Rana

Shahid Khan Vs Raj Kumar & Ors.

Prakash Vs Sarvesh Devi & Ors.