Dismissed
Sh. Bharat Rajak v. Mainuddin Ansari & Anr.
Delhi HCC.R.P./7/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
null
What did the court decide?
Revision petition disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~9
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- C.R.P. 7/2024 & CM APPL. 851/2024
¶4
SH. BHARAT RAJAK .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Rishabh Kanojiya and Mr. Srajan Tyagi, Advocates.
¶6
versus
¶7
MAINUDDIN ANSARI & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
¶9
O R D E R % 06.11.2024
¶10
- Learned counsel for the Revisionist submits that since the suit before the Trial Court itself stands withdrawn, the present Revision Petition has become infructuous.
¶11
- In view of the submissions made, the Revision is disposed of as infructuous.
¶12
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sh. Bharat Rajak
- respondent
Mainuddin Ansari
Coram
AI extract
Neena Bansal Krishna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court