The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear despite a second call, indicating a lack of desire to pursue the matter further.
Dismissed the appeal for lack of prosecution by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-39
SANDEEP JAIN .....Appellant
Through: None
versus
SUNIL KUMAR & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED) .....Respondent Through: Mr.J.P.N.Shahi and Mr.Divyanshu Kumar, Advocates for R-3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 08.07.2024
No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant even on second call. It seems that the appellant does not wish to pursue this matter any further.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
JULY 8, 2024 Dy/da
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 12:32:31
SANDEEP JAIN
SUNIL KUMAR
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
