Present appeal seeking provisional admission and study materials was closed without substantive disposal. Court directed the Appellant to cite relevant judgments on the distance criterion issue before the Single Judge on the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ S-21
MASTER LAVIK THROUGH HIS FATHER PINKU .....Appellant Through: Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Devanshu Khanna, Mr.Vinod Chauhan and Mr.Saransh Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel with Ms.Surbhi Soni, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr.Kamal Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Sparsh Aggarwal, Mr.Karan Chaudhary and Ms.Yosha Dutt, Advocates for R-2. Mr.Abhinav Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Mahendra Shukla, Advocate for MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
%
O R D E R 06.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:16:29
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
SEPTEMBER 6, 2024/ TS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:16:29
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is urgency to grant provisional admission to the Appellant without clarification from the Directorate of Education.
Master Lavik through his father Pinku
Govert of NCT of Delhi
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
