Appellant in a first appeal sought withdrawal with liberty to file an amendment application adding a relief of possession and supporting averments. The court disposed of the appeal accordingly, leaving the amendment to be considered by the Single Judge on its own merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJNEESH RAMPAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kawaljit Singh Bhatia, Advocate versus
SHANKER LAL ARORA @ SHANKAR ARORA & ANR
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay S. Chhabra and Mr. Satish Choudhary, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 05.09.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024/ Aj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2024 at 14:29:57
Rajneesh Rampal
Shanker Lal Arora @ Shankar Arora
Anr
Acting Chief Justice
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
