Union of India sought withdrawal of its appeal, stating the dispute was settled by the respondent's payment under the VIVAD SE VISHWAS Scheme. The application was allowed and the appeal disposed of as infructuous.
Application for withdrawal allowed; appeal disposed of as infructuous; hearing date cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~131.
UNION OF INDIA
..... Appellant
Through: Adv. Ms. Pratima N. Lakra, CGSC with Ms. Vrinda Baheti, Advocate.
Versus
M/S ASHI PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Samiksha Jain, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 08.02.2024
CM APPL. 7760/2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
FEBRUARY 8, 2024/ N.Khanna
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:30:36
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India
M/S Ashi Private Limited
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
