Appeal against an interim injunction order in a commercial suit was closed as infructuous since the suit had been disposed of and all interim orders ceased to be operative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
P. P. JEWELLERS RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
.....Appellants Through: Mr Karan Khanna Mr Harshit Khanduja and Mr Himanshu Satija, Advocates.
versus
P. P. JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr Tejaswi Bhanu, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R
% 07.08.2024
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SACHIN DATTA, J
AUGUST 07, 2024 M Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2024 at 11:35:34
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P. P. Jewellers Retail Private Limited & Ors.
P. P. Jewellers Private Limited
Vibhu Bakhru
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
