Decree holder sought withdrawal of its review petition seeking interest for delay in execution. The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to pursue remedies in accordance with law.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to seek recovery of interest in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD
.....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Pratham Sharma, Adv.
versus
UMED SINGH THROUGH LR & ORS. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 14.05.2025 REVIEW PET. 485/2024
Learned counsel for the review Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this application and avail its remedies in accordance with law for recovery of interest from the Judgment Debtor for the period of delay i.e., 14.12.2018 to 12.08.2024.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to be exercised albeit in accordance with law.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
MAY 14, 2025 /hp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/05/2025 at 13:04:32
Kushal Infraproject Industries India Ltd
Umed Singh through LR & Ors.
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
