The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit and pending applications in a property dispute. The court held that the reliefs sought were satisfied because defendant no. 4 had demolished an unauthorized construction in the suit property.
Suit and all pending applications disposed of; suit unconditionally withdrawn by plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
SONU ARORA .....Plaintiff
versus
SHABLU SURI & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Umesh Gupta, Advocate for D-1 to 3 with D-1 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 09.08.2024 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that defendant no. 4 has demolished the unauthorized construction in the suit property. He states that in view of action taken by defendant no. 4 the reliefs sought in the suit stands satisfied. He states that therefore, he has instructions from the plaintiff to unconditionally withdraw the present suit.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
AUGUST 9, 2024/ msh/sk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:34:29
SONU ARORA
SHABLU SURI
others
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
