The appellant requested to withdraw the cross-appeal. The respondents did not object. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and consequently closed the pending applications.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr Akshay Ringe, Mr Ankur Chawla, Mr Gurpreet Singh, Mr C.B. Bansal, Mr Kunal Aggarwal and Ms Prerna Mahajan, Advocates.
versus
PETER BECK UND PARTNER VERMOGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ankur Kashyap, Mr Ajith S. Ranganathan, Mr Rohit Rajershi, Mr Aman Bajaj and Mr Purushartha Singh, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 10.04.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
APRIL 10, 2024/ at
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2024 at 12:03:09
PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LTD
PETER BECK UND PARTNER VERMOGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH & ANR
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
