The plaintiff sought permission to withdraw the civil suit. The defendants raised no objection. The Court permitted the withdrawal of the suit and disposed of the pending applications.
Permission granted to withdraw the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
ORAVEL STAYS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Kshitij Parashar, Advocate.
versus
VISAKHAPATNAM HOTEL MERCHANT ASSOCIATION & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Manish Tiwari and Ms. Thashmitha Muthanna, Advocates for D1 to D6.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 10.05.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MAY 10, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 11:20:56
ORAVEL STAYS PRIVATE LIMITED
VISAKHAPATNAM HOTEL MERCHANT ASSOCIATION & ORS.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
