Dismissed
Smt. Karpal Kaur Reen v. Shri Ritesh Raj
Delhi HCCS(OS)/1/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Suit withdrawn under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC; dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~50
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CS(OS) 1/2008
¶4
SMT. KARPAL KAUR REEN ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr Akshay Makhija, Sr. Adv. with Ms Seerat Deep Singh, Adv. for LR of plaintiff. LR of plaintiff in person.
¶5
versus
¶6
SHRI RITESH RAJ ..... Defendant Through: Ms Shaoli Lala, Adv.
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 13.05.2024
¶9
I.A. 10878/2024
¶10
- This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC seeking withdrawal of the suit.
¶11
- Issue notice.
¶12
- Ms Lala, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the defendant and states that she has no objection if the application is allowed.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Smt. Karpal Kaur Reen
- respondent
Shri Ritesh Raj
Coram
AI extract
Jasmeet Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court