Disposed
Mohd. Saeed v. Arshad Ayyub
Delhi HCCS(OS)/384/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Suit for declaration regarding Global Property Authorization revoked via mediation settlement. Court disposed of suit per settlement and granted refund of court fees under Section 89 CPC.
What did the court decide?
Suit disposed per settlement; plaintiff entitled to refund of full court fee.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~17
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CS(OS) 384/2024 & I.A. 10731/2024
¶4
MOHD. SAEED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Reeya Singh, Advocate
¶5
versus
¶6
ARSHAD AYYUB .....Defendant
¶7
Through: Mr. Rander Mohd. Asif and Mr. Mateen Ahmad, Advocates
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 11.09.2024
¶9
- The present suit had been filed by the plaintiff praying for decree of declaration declaring that GPA dated 29.06.2022 executed by the plaintiff in favour of the defendant stands revoked/cancelled and is non-existent.
¶10
- Further relief of decree of possession as well as decree of mandatory injunction and permanent injunction had also been prayed. In short, the controversy was with regard to the sale of the suit property which was sold by the plaintiff for a total sale consideration of Rs. 4 crores.
¶11
- It is the pleaded case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff has already received a sum of Rs. 3,60,00,000/- out of the total agreed sale consideration of Rs. 4 crores, only an amount of Rs. 40 lakhs remains to be paid by the defendant.
Coram
AI extract
Vikas Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court