The court corrected a typographical error in the order dated 05.09.2024 regarding the appearance of counsel for defendant no. 9 and disposed of the application.
Correction of the record to reflect the correct names of counsel for defendant no. 9 as Mr. Krishnayan Sen and Mr. Damandeep Singh Bhalla.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi and Mr. Chirag Joshi, Advocates
Versus
DR SANJIV BANSAL & ORS.
.....Defendant Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik and Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocates for D-1 & D-2 Mr. Demandeep Singh, Advocate for D-9
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 09.10.2024 I.A. 41978/2024 (under Section 151 read with Section 152 of the CPC filed on behalf of D-1 & D-2 filed on behalf of defendant no. 9)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2024 at 12:03:02
defendant no. 9 in the attendance of order dated 05.09.2024.
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
OCTOBER 9, 2024/‘ rs’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2024 at 12:03:02
DR MANISH BANSAL
DR SANJIV BANSAL
Defendant No. 9
VIKAS MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
