The Delhi High Court decreed a suit for partition in favor of the plaintiffs based on a settlement agreement reached amicably on 04.11.2022. The court held that the voluntary settlement is binding and ordered the decree in terms thereof.
Suit for partition decreed in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 04.11.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
MS. SANGEETA SHARMA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs
Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Mr. Harshit Jain, Advocates with plaintiff No. 2.
versus
SH. HEMANT SHARMA & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ashish Upadhyay and Mr. Siddharth Jain, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 16.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 15:12:12
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 15:12:12
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit for partition should be decreed on the parties reaching an amicable settlement.
Whether the Settlement Agreement dated 04.11.2022 should form part of the decree.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ms. Sangeeta Sharma & Anr
Sh. Hemant Sharma & Anr
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
